Webhard
what's webhard? 
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud has to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream. 
 
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%. 
 
When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem). 
 
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible. 
 
 File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned). 
 
 웹하드순위 Webhard 
 
It includes a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud. 
 
In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality. 
 
When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only should be in a folder. 
 
You will need to share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos. 
 
According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.*** 
 
It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point) 
 
It has a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services as a whole, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services. 
 
You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly. 
 
Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. And when it's in that state, you should discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again. 
 
The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level. 
 
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive) 
 
Google Drive 
 
It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK. 
 
It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users. 
 
It is easy to interact with other Google services such as Gmail. 
 
Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite). 
 
 Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me. 
 
There are the most apps which can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment. 
 
Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less. 
 
There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy. 
 
If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?) 
 
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?) 
 
 
Dropbox 
 
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for every photo). However, if you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It's the best in the world in terms of media reading. 
 
There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc. 
 
 
 
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive. 
 
The file capacity limit which can be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB. 
 
 The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files. 
 
The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt. 
 
Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards... 
 
There exists a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents. 
 
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents. 
 
 The dropbox itself cannot be documented. 
 
There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and work on it leisurely. 
 
Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can be flipped over the file or file, as is seen in the photo file. 
 
File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small. 
 
Slow. Not paid people. 
 
Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test. 
 
The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only. 
 
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported. 
 
 If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it's much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive). 
 
It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.*** 
 
Skydrive 
 
The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged. 
 
The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference. 
 
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.
Read More: https://www.nandadisk.com